Review articles summarize and synthesize existing research on a specific topic, offering a comprehensive overview of current knowledge, trends, and debates. They consolidate findings from multiple studies, providing insights into the state of research, identifying gaps, and suggesting future directions for investigation in the field.

Narrative Review Article

Narrative review articles provide a qualitative summary of literature on a topic, focusing on interpretation and analysis rather than systematic data synthesis. They offer historical context, discuss key findings, and often include the author's perspective or theoretical framework. Unlike systematic reviews, narrative reviews may be less structured and more subjective, aiming to provide a broad understanding of the subject by weaving together diverse sources and perspectives to create a cohesive narrative.

Required Inputs What we will do
  • Title of the review
  • Main aim and objectives of the review
  • Outline of the review (optional)
  • A few relevant articles
  • Thorough literature search
  • Critical review of the articles
  • Discussing the topic under specific headings and subheadings
  • Preparation of tables and figures summarizing the observations
  • Identifying inconsistencies in the literature
  • Critical comments and future recommendations Conclusion
  • A list of references
  • Target journal formatting (if requested)

Systematic Review/Scoping Review

Systematic review articles rigorously analyze existing literature on a specific research question using predefined methods to minimize bias. They systematically search, appraise, and synthesize relevant studies, often quantitatively pooling data to assess the overall strength of evidence. Systematic reviews aim to provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of existing research findings, identify patterns or inconsistencies across studies, and offer evidence-based conclusions that inform practice, policy, or further research in the field. They are valued for their methodological rigor and ability to synthesize complex bodies of evidence. Systematic reviews are done strictly following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

Required Inputs What we will do
  • Title of the study
  • Main aim and objectives of the review
  • PICO statement (P=Population, I= Intervention, C= Comparator/control, O= Outcome)
  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Keywords to be used to perform literature search
  • Databases to be searched
  • Duration of literature search
  • * If you are not able to provide us with the requested inputs, then our experts will prepare a review protocol for you. However, you have to provide us with the title of the study.
  • Our experts will perform the review as per the PRISMA guidelines.
  • Designing search strategies and search strings
  • Conducting literature search in specific databases
  • Performing deduplication
  • Title and abstract screening
  • Full text screening
  • Finalizing the articles to be included
  • Quality check/Risk of bias analysis
  • Data extraction in a tabular format
  • Synthesis of the review
  • Critical analysis of the included articles
  • Critical comments and future recommendations
  • Conclusion
  • A list of references
  • Target journal formatting (if requested)

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic reviews rigorously synthesize and analyze existing research on a specific topic using predefined methods to minimize bias, adhering closely to PRISMA guidelines. They aim to provide a comprehensive summary of relevant studies, assessing their quality and synthesizing findings to answer a specific research question. Meta-analysis, a statistical technique used within systematic reviews, quantitatively combines data from multiple studies to calculate a pooled effect size or outcome measure. This technique employs forest plots to visually represent study results and assess heterogeneity across studies, ensuring a robust and precise synthesis of evidence to inform clinical practice, policy decisions, or further research agendas.

Required Inputs What we will do
  • Title of the study
  • Main aim and objectives of the review
  • PICO statement (P=Population, I= Intervention, C= Comparator/control, O= Outcome)
  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Keywords to be used to perform literature search
  • Databases to be searched
  • Duration of literature search
  • * If you are not able to provide us with the requested inputs, then our experts will prepare a review protocol for you. However, you have to provide us with the title of the study.
  • Our experts will perform the review as per the PRISMA guidelines.
  • Designing search strategies and search strings
  • Conducting literature search in specific databases
  • Performing deduplication
  • Title and abstract screening
  • Full text screening
  • Finalizing the articles to be included
  • Quality check/Risk of bias analysis
  • Data extraction in a tabular format
  • Performing meta-analysis by appropriate statistical tools such as Revman, STATA, R, etc.
  • Preparing the Funnel plots and Forest plots to check for heterogeneity among the included articles
  • Synthesis of the results
  • Critical analysis of the included articles
  • Discussion of the findings of meta-analysis
  • Critical comments and future recommendations
  • Conclusion
  • A list of references
  • Target journal formatting (if requested)

Chat to us?